Tue Mar 21 18:37:00 GMT 2006
On Mar 21 12:52, Charles Wilson wrote:
> I have one concern with that plan, tho: Would the transparent_exe logic
> ALSO extend to other PATHEXT extensions? Does 'foo' conflict with
> 'foo.bat' (and foo.com, foo.vbs, foo.cmd, foo.wsh, ...) or ONLY with
"foo" doesn't conflict with anything but "foo.exe" and "foo.lnk" (and,
fwiw, "foo.exe.lnk"). These two suffixes are the only suffixes which
are hidden to the user in one way or the other.
> There's one other minor issue, too: the batch file (but not the #!
> script) would be limited to 9 command-line parameters.
Really? I think the cmd shell knows a "shift" command, too.
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
More information about the Cygwin-apps