New GMP and MPFR packages for review

Corinna Vinschen
Thu Nov 9 09:10:00 GMT 2006

On Nov  9 09:02, Billinghurst, David (CALCRTS) wrote:
> > From:  Corinna Vinschen
> > I'm not using this so I can't test.  The packaging looks good.  But I don't think
> > the gmp package should have libgmp-devel in its requirements.  This contradicts the
> > purpose of differing between runtime and devel packages.  The devel package should
> > only be pulled if the user explicitely requests it, isn't it?
> I have fixed the dependencies in the setup.hint files.  As these are generated
> by cygport I also updated the src package (and rebuilt gmp and mpfr as a check).

Uploaded.  I removed gmp 4.1.2-1 which leaves 4.1.4-2 as prev.

However, I'm still wondering if the libmpfr-devel package shouldn't
have a dependency to libgmp-devel.  After all, gmp.h is included from
one of the mpfr header files...

> This e-mail and any attachments [...]


Thanks for taking over maintainership!


Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

More information about the Cygwin-apps mailing list