[HEADSUP] Let's start a Cygwin 1.7 release area
Tue Apr 8 21:07:00 GMT 2008
On Apr 8 14:41, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 07:40:13PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Apr 8 13:26, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >> cygwin-xp? cygwin-2008?
> >cysta? :)
> >cygwin-2008 isn't bad, though.
> >> cygwin-nextgen?
> >Or just cygwin-new, maybe. I'd take any of them, -new or -2008.
> In my experience, adding a "new" to any directory or file is a
> guaranteed way of ensuring that the name will not always be accurate.
Why, we could always name the next versions "cygwin-newer",
"cygwin-evenmorenew", "cygwin-newerthannew" and
> How about cygwinng?
With a dash? cygwin-ng? Like syslog-ng. I was going to suggest this
too, but I didn't want to copy the naming too bluntly. I guess we
should use "cygwin-notasnewbutstillnewenough". I'm still more leaning
towards cygwin-2008. You shouldn't have suggested the name. It's all
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
More information about the Cygwin-apps