[HEADSUP] Let's start a Cygwin 1.7 release area
Tue Apr 15 16:16:00 GMT 2008
2008/4/15, Corinna Vinschen:
> On Apr 15 10:17, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > I also object to using "Red Hat" as the "owner" [...]
> Red Hat *is* the owner of the code, regardless of the registry key you
> want to use. I know that you have mixed feelings about Red Hat,
> however, assuming the code is owned by the FSF, would you object against
> a parent key name of FSF as well?
Cannot we just use just "Cygwin" as the most obvious choice.
We really don't have to use some artificial company name.
More information about the Cygwin-apps