New Setup for Cygwin 1.7 on cygwin.com
Thu Aug 21 15:57:00 GMT 2008
On Aug 21 11:37, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 05:20:41PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Aug 21 11:12, Charles Wilson wrote:
> >> Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >> > To rephrase: I think it is a bad idea to remove dependencies from
> >> > _update-info-dir since so many things rely on it.
> >> Unless:
> >> 1) all of _update-info-dir's dependencies are already satisfied by the
> >> Base category
> >> or
> >> 2) we carefully map the dependency chains of the basic system-setup
> >> packages (cygwin, base-*, a few more?) and deliberately exclude them
> >> from getting _update-info-dir added to their dependency list.
> >> or
> >> 3) somehow add a priority scheme to postinstall scripts, so that in
> >> the event of a cycle, setup "starts" traversing the dependency loop at
> >> the package with the highest priority.
> >> In order of least effort to most, I'd vote #1...
> >Full ACK.
> If only this was a democracy.
> I've made the change I mentioned. Neither bash nor texinfo rely on
I don't think this is the right solution. How does that help with other
loops? I only checked packages which were in front of the cygwin
package in the dependency order for a plain Base install. The list of
dependencies for a full install is much bigger.
You're fixing single symptoms, rather than taking out the core problem.
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
More information about the Cygwin-apps