[rurban: Re: setup.exe command line parameters]

[Brian Dessent]

Dave Korn wrote:

>   Yes, but we haven't actually made that release yet, so I don't see why not
> to bung in a couple of user feature requests while I'm working on it.

In that case we should just smooth over the sharp edges on HEAD and do a
real release and forget about backporting.  With the addition of the
"check for and cope with a 'tar -T /dev/null' header of 512 \0s" fix I
think we'd be close, since in this context we're not talking about the
1.7 functionality.  That is certainly going to be better than picking
and choosing a couple of enhancements, which seems rather arbitrary to
me.

Brian