[rurban: Re: setup.exe command line parameters]

Ralph Hempel rhempel@bmts.com
Tue Jun 24 13:53:00 GMT 2008

Brian Dessent wrote:
> Dave Korn wrote:
>>   Yes, but we haven't actually made that release yet, so I don't see why not
>> to bung in a couple of user feature requests while I'm working on it.
> In that case we should just smooth over the sharp edges on HEAD and do a
> real release and forget about backporting.  With the addition of the
> "check for and cope with a 'tar -T /dev/null' header of 512 \0s" fix I
> think we'd be close, since in this context we're not talking about the
> 1.7 functionality.  That is certainly going to be better than picking
> and choosing a couple of enhancements, which seems rather arbitrary to
> me.

Am I correct in understanding that the HEAD code is still for the
current cygwin and not for the upcoming 1.7, or will setup.exe
be comaptible with both?


More information about the Cygwin-apps mailing list