Mon Sep 1 06:16:00 GMT 2008
On 8/31/2008 8:05 PM, Brian Dessent wrote:
> David Rothenberger wrote:
>> I've changed the package structure as follows:
>> ~ * libapr1: Runtime library and documentation.
>> ~ * libapr1-devel: Development headers and libraries.
>> ~ * apr1: Source package.
> Something seems wrong here.
> Okay, so you want to rename apr1 to apr1-devel, that makes some sense.
> But why does apr1 continue to contain just the source? Why not just
> have apr1-devel contain the source and make apr1 a completely empty
Okay. I'll rebuild with apr1 being an empty transition package and
libapr1 containing the source.
> Does this also mean that you will take over these as well:
> @ aprutil1
> @ libaprutil1
Yes, I'm working on those as well.
> Also, there are these four old ABI=0 packages to deal with:
> @ apr
> @ libapr0
> @ apr-util
> @ libaprutil0
> I can't find anything in current setup.ini that actually requires these
> ABI=0 versions (other than themselves) so can't we just delete the above
> four outright?
I guess so.
> Or, how about the following idea: repurpose the the package named "apr"
> (which was previously the ABI=0 one) to be the main documentation and
> source package for the current ABI=1
I don't see any reason to put the documentation in a separate package,
so I'm going to go with
libapr1: runtime and documentation, source
David Rothenberger ---- firstname.lastname@example.org
The practice of trying to determine the year a movie was made
by deciphering the Roman numerals at the end of the credits.
-- Rich Hall, "Sniglets"
More information about the Cygwin-apps