On Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 05:39:10PM -0700, Brian Dessent wrote: >Chris Sutcliffe wrote: >>My question is, should I use the same naming convention for the Cygwin >>distribution, or keep things the status quo? > >That doesn't conform to the Cygwin standards, so I'd say no. Especially since upset would croak on the numbering. cgf