Updated: [Test-version] xemacs-21.5.28-3/xemacs-tags-21.5.28-3/xemacs-emacs-common-21.5.28-3

[Mark Harig]

More explicitly,

    xemacs --> depends on/requires --> xemacs-emacs-common

and

     emacs --> depends on/requires --> xemacs-emacs-common

It might be clearer if 'xemacs-emacs-common' was renamed using the 
plural for
emacs, that is, 'emacsen-common'.  Also, I'm not sure that the package
should have the same version number ('21.5.28.3') as xemacs.  That 
versioning
suggests that it is a part of xemacs when it is shared by both emacs and 
xemacs.
> Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> A new *TEST* version of 'xemacs' has been uploaded to a server near you.
>
> The recently-announced update (February 01, 2009) to 
> 'xemacs-emacs-common'
> appears to have re-introduced the problem described, below, namely, that
> the package 'xemacs-emacs-common' depends on the package 'xemacs'.  The
> package 'xemacs-emacs-common' needs to be independent so that both emacs
> and xemacs users may install it without installing the other editor.
>
>
>>>>>> Eric Blake writes:
>
>    > According to Angelo Graziosi on 7/19/2007 8:51 AM:
>    >>    >> 1)
>    >> Emacs22 depend on xemacs-emacs-common which depend from xemacs: 
> WHY to
>    >> install emacs one should install XEmacs ?
>
>    > That sounds like a backwards dependency.  Volker, shouldn't it be 
> that
>    > xemacs depends on xemacs-emacs-common, and that 
> xemacs-emacs-common is
>    > standalone?  If you agree, I can change the setup.hints.
>
>> You're right, my fault. I don't have sourceware access today. So please
>> change the setup hint. (also from the xemacs test version please)
>>
>> Ciao
>>   Volker
>
>