[ITP] Macaulay2 1.1

[Daniel R. Grayson]

> Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 14:14:26 -0500
> From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please@cygwin.com>
> To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com
> Subject: Re: [ITP] Macaulay2 1.1
> Reply-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com
> 
> On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 01:04:39PM -0600, Daniel R. Grayson wrote:
> >I submitted an ITP for Macaulay 2 on Nov 11 and there have been no
> >positive votes since then.  I would have thought that by now, if there
> >were any interest in having it in cygwin, there would have been a
> >positive vote.  I understand that 5 are required.
> 
> I don't really grok this paragraph.  The point of voting is to see if
> there is interest.  If no one voted then, yes, that would indicate
> that there was no interest.

Sorry, perhaps I should have mentioned that the number of replies to my initial
message seemed to indicate some interest.

By the way, Macaulay 2 is comparable to Singular, which is included in Cygwin.