[ITP] mintty 0.3.4

Dave Korn dave.korn.cygwin@googlemail.com
Mon Jan 19 00:25:00 GMT 2009

Eric Blake wrote:
> According to Ralph Hempel on 1/18/2009 4:44 PM:
>> Charles Wilson wrote:
>>> Doesn't cygwin officially support i386, or are we allowed to assume i586
>>> and above, now?
>> Considering that support for Win98 is going to be dropped, the
>> question may be answered if Win2K or better will even run on
>> a 386 or 486? :-)
> In which case, shouldn't the gcc defaults be bumped to require this by
> default?

  According to


the minimum is i586 (Pentium 1).  So yes, we should change the gcc defaults.
I'll fix my local patchset and try to remember to post a patch upstream as well.


More information about the Cygwin-apps mailing list