[ITP] mintty 0.3.4
Mon Jan 19 09:16:00 GMT 2009
On Jan 18 19:46, Charles Wilson wrote:
> Ralph Hempel wrote:
> > Charles Wilson wrote:
> >> Doesn't cygwin officially support i386, or are we allowed to assume i586
> >> and above, now?
> > Considering that support for Win98 is going to be dropped, the
> > question may be answered if Win2K or better will even run on
> > a 386 or 486? :-)
> a) cygwin-1.7 will still support NT, IIRC, so the relevant question is
> what processor NT supports, not W2k.
> b) we haven't dropped Win9x support YET -- that won't happen until
> cygwin-1.7 is officially released. Right now it's still in...what?
> public beta?
Maybe I'm too modern or something, but I think that i586 is as old as we
should care these days, CPU-wise. Even if we still support NT4 and,
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
More information about the Cygwin-apps