[RFU 1.5 and 1.7] libaprutil1-1.3.7
Wed Jul 1 10:52:00 GMT 2009
On Jun 30 09:02, David Rothenberger wrote:
> On 6/30/2009 1:30 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> Here, the aprutil1 package still exists in the 1.7 release area, but
>> I don't think it makes sense anymore, along the same lines as for
>> libapr1. I think it should be ok to remove it from the 1.7 release.
>> What do you say?
> The aprutil1 and apr1 packages are just transition packages to help
> people upgrade from the old package naming schema to the new one. They
> don't need to be in the 1.7 area if we believe everyone will have
> updated their apr1 and aprutil1 packages before they try to upgrade to
> 1.7. I'm not sure that's true, though. It seems there are at least some
> people that only update once every 3-5 years. :-)
So you'd rather have the apr1 package in the 1.7 release as well?
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
More information about the Cygwin-apps