[RFU 1.5 and 1.7] libaprutil1-1.3.7

[Corinna Vinschen]

On Jul  1 09:49, David Rothenberger wrote:
> On 7/1/2009 3:52 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> On Jun 30 09:02, David Rothenberger wrote:
>>> On 6/30/2009 1:30 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>>> Here, the aprutil1 package still exists in the 1.7 release area, but
>>>> I don't think it makes sense anymore, along the same lines as for
>>>> libapr1.  I think it should be ok to remove it from the 1.7 release.
>>>> What do you say?
>>> The aprutil1 and apr1 packages are just transition packages to help   
>>> people upgrade from the old package naming schema to the new one. 
>>> They  don't need to be in the 1.7 area if we believe everyone will 
>>> have  updated their apr1 and aprutil1 packages before they try to 
>>> upgrade to  1.7. I'm not sure that's true, though. It seems there are 
>>> at least some  people that only update once every 3-5 years. :-)
>>
>> So you'd rather have the apr1 package in the 1.7 release as well?
>
> I don't know the right answer.

What I was trying to say is this:  It's your choice.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat