[RFU 1.5 and 1.7] libaprutil1-1.3.7

David Rothenberger daveroth@acm.org
Wed Jul 1 20:47:00 GMT 2009

On 7/1/2009 12:24 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jul  1 09:49, David Rothenberger wrote:
>> On 7/1/2009 3:52 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>> On Jun 30 09:02, David Rothenberger wrote:
>>>> On 6/30/2009 1:30 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>>>> Here, the aprutil1 package still exists in the 1.7 release area, but
>>>>> I don't think it makes sense anymore, along the same lines as for
>>>>> libapr1.  I think it should be ok to remove it from the 1.7 release.
>>>>> What do you say?
>>>> The aprutil1 and apr1 packages are just transition packages to help   
>>>> people upgrade from the old package naming schema to the new one. 
>>>> They  don't need to be in the 1.7 area if we believe everyone will 
>>>> have  updated their apr1 and aprutil1 packages before they try to 
>>>> upgrade to  1.7. I'm not sure that's true, though. It seems there are 
>>>> at least some  people that only update once every 3-5 years. :-)
>>> So you'd rather have the apr1 package in the 1.7 release as well?
>> I don't know the right answer.
> What I was trying to say is this:  It's your choice.

Okay, then yes, I'd like to have the apr1 and aprutil1 packages in the 
1.7 release area.


David Rothenberger  ----  daveroth@acm.org

economist, n:
         Someone who's good with figures, but doesn't have enough
         personality to become an accountant.

More information about the Cygwin-apps mailing list