[Please upload] varnish-2.1.2-5 , varnish-2.1.4-5 and varnish-r5665-5

[Christopher Faylor]

On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:31:46PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
>
>Please, don't http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#TOFU
>
>
>On Jan 11 22:30, jdzstz - gmail dot com wrote:
>> About varnish cache application, the packages are GTG for David.
>> 
>> Please somebody upload the three packages  (Prev, Curr and Test) to
>> cygwin servers.  The package URL that I send in my previous email
>> were:
>> 
>> wget http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/cygvarnish/cygwin-varnish%20package/varnish-2.1.2-5-src.tar.bz2
>> wget http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/cygvarnish/cygwin-varnish%20package/varnish-2.1.2-5.tar.bz2
>> wget http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/cygvarnish/cygwin-varnish%20package/varnish-2.1.4-5-src.tar.bz2
>> wget http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/cygvarnish/cygwin-varnish%20package/varnish-2.1.4-5.tar.bz2
>> wget http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/cygvarnish/cygwin-varnish%20package/varnish-r5665-5-src.tar.bz2
>> wget http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/cygvarnish/cygwin-varnish%20package/varnish-r5665-5.tar.bz2
>> wget http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/cygvarnish/cygwin-varnish%20package/setup.hint
>
>Uploaded, but only the curr and test versions.  I didn't upload
>2.1.2-5 and I removed the "Prev" entry from the setup.hint file.
>I don't think there's any sense to upload a version which is
>already obsolete and which, due to it's state as old version,
>is probably never installed by any user.

Why would we release a "test" version in the very first offering of
a new package?  That doesn't make any sense to me.

cgf