[ITP] ImageMagick-6.7.6.2-1

marco atzeri marco.atzeri@gmail.com
Sat Mar 31 16:18:00 GMT 2012


On 3/31/2012 5:26 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Mar 31 15:49, marco atzeri wrote:
>> On 3/31/2012 12:26 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>> On Mar 30 16:23, marco atzeri wrote:
>>>> continuing to reuse the Yaakov efforts, I just removed
>>>> some dependency that are not in the distro and modified
>>>> the test call.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> to download (remove the index.html's) :
>>>> [....]
>>>> ImageMagick-6.7.6.2-1-src.tar.bz2
>>>> ImageMagick-6.7.6.2-1.tar.bz2
>>>> ImageMagick-doc/ImageMagick-doc-6.7.6.2-1.tar.bz2
>>>> ImageMagick-doc/setup.hint
>>>> libMagick-devel/libMagick-devel-6.7.6.2-1.tar.bz2
>>>> libMagick-devel/setup.hint
>>>> libMagickCore5/libMagickCore5-6.7.6.2-1.tar.bz2
>>>> libMagickCore5/setup.hint
>>>
>>> I'm a bit puzzled.  Version 6.3.0.1 came with a library package called
>>> libMagick10.  6.4.0.6 came with a library called libImageMagick1, and
>>> now we get libMagickCore5.
>>>
>>> Is there some secret scheme behind the changing library names?
>>>
>>> And, after uploading 6.7.6.2-1, can we remove 6.3.0.1 together with
>>> libMagick10, given that it's not used by any package in the distro?
>>>
>>>
>>> Corinna
>>>
>>
>> for what I see on the source
>>
>> MAGICK_LIBRARY_CURRENT=5
>> MAGICK_LIBRARY_REVISION=0
>> MAGICK_LIBRARY_AGE=0
>>
>> so the 5 seems right.
>
> I wasn't talking about the version number, but about the library name
> itself:
>
>      libMagick vs. libImageMagick vs. libMagickCore
>
>
> Corinna
>

I guess Yaakov copied from debian

http://packages.debian.org/sid/imagemagick
for the libMagickCore

I see no issues to use a more standard

ImageMagick
libImageMagick-devel
libImageMagick5
perl-Image-Magick

I could easily repack.

Yaakov,
any problem on cygport side ?
I see only one package (virtuoso-opensource)
depending from libMagickCore5

while dvdauthor, gejengel, inkscape, libxine1-image, psiconv, zbar
need libImageMagick1

regards
Marco




More information about the Cygwin-apps mailing list