Fri Nov 16 18:36:00 GMT 2012
On 11/16/2012 7:02 PM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-11-16 at 12:10 +0100, marco atzeri wrote:
>> ok, but why shortening to libmpi ?
>> In theory there are other mpi implementation around.
> The libraries are named libmpi (cygmpi-1.dll, libmpi.dll.a, etc.), and I
> prefer lib package names to match the actual lib name rather than the
> source package name. If other implementations also use libmpi as a
> library name, then anyways we will only be able to ship one (conflicting
I followed debian nomenclature and file partitioning
and I prefer to leave like that
>> one more dependency is not a problem.
>> Waiting for your ITP before "-4"
>> Should we go for this route : KEEP_LA_FILES="none" ?
>> I already noticed that the libnetcdf-devel is broken as
>> /usr/lib/libnetcdf.la require libcurl.la that does not exist anymore.
> If it were up to me, I would make it the default; it would just take a
> mass rebuild to rid (almost) all packages of them. In any case, as this
> is new to the distro, nothing else depends on it yet, so there's nothing
> to break.
I was just thinking to make the same for any future update
of my packages.
More information about the Cygwin-apps