On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote: > I don't see what was unclear about the old wording. Your proposed wording > implies that announcement messages begin with [RFU] or [ITP] and that is > not accurate. That's what shows up in cygwin-apps messages. > > cygwin-apps != cygwin-announce Good point. It's fine as is.