[ITP] w32api r5431 [Was: Re: [ITA] w32api-3.0b_svn5368-1]

[JonY]

On 10/17/2012 16:20, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Oct 16 20:02, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
>> On Sat, 2012-10-13 at 13:36 +0800, JonY wrote:
>>> I decided do a simpler split out version due to the way the source package 
>>> is built, with w32api as a meta package.
>>> If required I can redo it into a single package.
>>>
>>> Preference? Comments?
>>>
>>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Cygwin%20Snapshots/dist/w32api-libs/setup.hint
>>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Cygwin%20Snapshots/dist/w32api-libs/w32api-libs-3.0b_svn5431-1-src.tar.bz2
>>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Cygwin%20Snapshots/dist/w32api-libs/w32api-libs-3.0b_svn5431-1.tar.bz2
>>
>> I think the sdesc: is confusing.  How about:
>>
>> sdesc: "Windows API headers"
>>
>>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Cygwin%20Snapshots/dist/w32api-includes/setup.hint
>>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Cygwin%20Snapshots/dist/w32api-includes/w32api-includes-3.0b_svn5431-1-src.tar.bz2
>>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Cygwin%20Snapshots/dist/w32api-includes/w32api-includes-3.0b_svn5431-1.tar.bz2
>>
>> sdesc: "Windows API import libraries"
>>
>> But wouldn't w32api-headers be a better name?
> 
> You have a point there, Yaakov.
> 
> In fact, you already set a precedent with your mingw packages, Jon.  We
> have mingw64-headers and mingw64-runtime packages.  I'm not *that* sure
> about the runtime name, but a consistent naming sounds like a good idea.
> 

Alright, will rename it.



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin-apps/attachments/20121017/b356008f/attachment.sig>