[ITA] w32api-3.0b_svn5368-1

[Corinna Vinschen]

On Aug 20 20:15, JonY wrote:
> On 8/14/2012 16:02, Kai Tietz wrote:
> > 2012/8/14 Corinna Vinschen:
> >> On Aug 14 08:46, Andy Koppe wrote:
> >>> Yep, mintty builds fine with that, and appears to work. For some
> >>> reason it's 9K bigger than with the current w32api though.
> >>
> >> I think this is because the mingw-w64 libs come with a couple more
> >> static elements built into the libs (GUIDs and stuff).
> >>
> >> Kai, can you explain the difference?
> >>
> >>
> >> Corinna
> > 
> > Well, major difference here is - as you already mentioned - the fact
> > that mingw-w64 provides some helper-routines (as described by msdn) in
> > ws2_32 and some other libraries.  Also the uuid-library is a bit
> > bigger.  Also we provide some of the intrinsic-function as
> > inline-code, which might be responsible for some size-improvment - but
> > better optimization - you notice.  Btw have you checked size with
> > debugging-information, or without?
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Kai
> > 
> 
> 
> New version up. Was the first uploaded?
> 
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Cygwin%20Snapshots/dist/w32api/w32api-3.0b_svn5373-1-src.tar.bz2/download
> 
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Cygwin%20Snapshots/dist/w32api/w32api-3.0b_svn5373-1.tar.bz2/download
> 
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Cygwin%20Snapshots/dist/w32api/setup.hint/download

None have been uploaded so far.  I'm not sure of the current state
of the discussion.  Are the above w32api headers good to go or is
a new version in the loop?


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat