GCC-4.7.2-2: Go/No-go?

[Corinna Vinschen]

On Apr 11 01:58, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> On 2013-04-11 01:02, Dave Korn wrote:
> >   Yep, sure.  *sigh*, I'm sure we'll suddenly find out that someone was using
> >it and wants to know where it's gone.  (I suppose if that happens I could
> >always consider rolling a gcc3 package with all -3 suffixed executables.)
> 
> 3.4 is EOL and should have been dropped long ago; we simply don't
> have the resources to support it ourselves.  Just about any software
> that people are building today either works with recent 4.x or the
> distros have a patch for it.

FWIW, I agree.


AOL-Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat