[HEADSUP] Please try to build your packages for 64 bit

[Yaakov (Cygwin/X)]

On 2013-04-23 05:20, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> But isn't that what noarch packages are about?  Since they are
> architecture-independent you can easily share them.  Or do you have an
> example where we must have different versions of a noarch package in the
> i686 and the x86_64 release?

In general, we should be aiming to provide the same versions of software 
for both arches ASAP.

But let's not confuse (entirely) noarch packages and noarch 
subpackage(s) of an otherwise-arch package; we can avoid marking the 
latter noarch until we get the i686 and x86_64 versions in sync.


Yaakov