nuke cygwin legacy?
Peter A. Castro
Sat Feb 9 02:50:00 GMT 2013
On Tue, 5 Feb 2013, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 12:41:36 -0500
> Subject: nuke cygwin legacy?
> Corinna +1'ed my suggestion that it was time to remove cygwin 1.5
> support so I'm wondering if anyone has any objections to removing
> 1.5 from cygwin.com.
> I was going to suggest this a few months ago and mention that the Cygwin
> Time Machine was an alternative but it looks like that service is no
> longer available.
That is incorrect. The Cygwin Time Machine is still up and actively
collecting updates. I have been having internet connectivity issues as of
late, but those (hopefully) should have (mostly) been resolved.
If you can't get to the Time Machine, wait a few minutes and try again.
> So, as an alternative, we could advertise that the directory is going
> away on the main web page for a month before nuking it.
--=> Peter A. Castro
Email: doctor at fruitbat dot org / Peter dot Castro at oracle dot com
"Cats are just autistic Dogs" -- Dr. Tony Attwood
More information about the Cygwin-apps