GCC maintainer volunteer?
Wed Feb 27 12:06:00 GMT 2013
On 2/25/2013 22:40, JonY wrote:
> On 2/24/2013 12:55, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 10:01:56AM +0800, JonY wrote:
>>> On 2/24/2013 09:39, Ken Brown wrote:
>>>> But isn't all this irrelevant for you? There's no reason to keep gcc3
>>>> around anymore, is there?
>>> I don't know, I'll leave that to the core Cygwin devs to decide.
>> I'd be happy to get rid of it but don't people still use it? We can't
>> have the gcc4 package overwriting someone's gcc3 if so.
> Anyway, packaging is taking longer than expected, still working on
> packaging bugs.
> I'm thinking of releasing a test version without Java, not all the
> patches have been integrated yet.
I now have gcc4-4.7.2-1 built with all the patches integrated but Java
doesn't build, it is a separate issue. I'm hesitant to push it directly
to the download servers, might break things.
I've put the following in the hits file:
Any staging areas or advice?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 834 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the Cygwin-apps