GCC maintainer volunteer?

[JonY]

On 2/25/2013 22:40, JonY wrote:
> On 2/24/2013 12:55, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 10:01:56AM +0800, JonY wrote:
>>> On 2/24/2013 09:39, Ken Brown wrote:
>>>
>>>> But isn't all this irrelevant for you?  There's no reason to keep gcc3
>>>> around anymore, is there?
>>>
>>> I don't know, I'll leave that to the core Cygwin devs to decide.
>>
>> I'd be happy to get rid of it but don't people still use it?  We can't
>> have the gcc4 package overwriting someone's gcc3 if so.
>>
> 
> OK.
> 
> Anyway, packaging is taking longer than expected, still working on
> packaging bugs.
> 
> I'm thinking of releasing a test version without Java, not all the
> patches have been integrated yet.
> 

I now have gcc4-4.7.2-1 built with all the patches integrated but Java
doesn't build, it is a separate issue. I'm hesitant to push it directly
to the download servers, might break things.

I've put the following in the hits file:
curr: 4.5.3-3
prev: 4.3.4-4
test: 4.7.2-1

Any staging areas or advice?


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 834 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin-apps/attachments/20130227/7de7c284/attachment.sig>