cygwin-pkg-maint maintance

Corinna Vinschen
Fri Aug 15 09:00:00 GMT 2014

On Aug 14 23:29, Marco Atzeri wrote:
> On 14/08/2014 22:51, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Aug 14 22:28, Marco Atzeri wrote:
> >>The build methods is maintainer choice.
> >>I use cygport but I don't see a reason to mandate it.
> >
> >Tiny correction:  New packages should use cygport.  We should really all
> >use the same packaging system.  After all, you don't use rpm files on
> >Debian or dpkg files on Fedora.
> "should" is not "must". ;-)

Yes, that's me being vague, as usual.  We're going to convert the
"should" to a "must" for new packages, though, and an additional
"should" for updates to older packages.


Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <>

More information about the Cygwin-apps mailing list