[HEADSUP] Base category
Sat Dec 6 17:39:00 GMT 2014
On 12/6/2014 11:57 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> isn't it rather annoying that even Base packages have dependencies
> outside the Base category? So, even if I perform a plain Base-only
> installation, I get asked if dependencies shall be fullfilled, which, as
> a question, is more than borderline anyway.
> Therefore, shouldn't we put all packages Base packages depend on into
> Base as well?
That makes sense to me. The popup about dependencies could be confusing
for someone installing Cygwin for the first time.
> Also, can we automate this?
I'm not sure that's a good idea. If the dependencies of a Base package
change, it's probably good for this to be noticeable, in case it was due
to a packaging error.
More information about the Cygwin-apps