Sun Dec 7 11:27:00 GMT 2014
On 12/7/2014 11:03 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Dec 7 10:52, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> Hi Marco,
>> On Dec 6 22:55, Marco Atzeri wrote:
>>> OpenBLAS is an optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2 1.13 BSD version.
>>> OpenBLAS is licensed under the 3-clause BSD license.
>> Having said that, shouldn't the dynamic library be in the openblas
>> package, or, alternatively, shouldn't the (empty) OpenBLAS package
>> require libopenblas_dynamic?
>> I just had a look into the Fedora package where the openblas package
>> contains the shared library and the basic documentation:
>> $ rpm -ql openblas
>> Nevertheless, it's your call, so you can upload any time.
> Btw., where did you get the packaging layout from? On Fedora it
> looks like this:
> openblas Shared lib
> openblas-devel Headers and libs
> openblas-static Static lib
> openblas-openmp OpenMP version (whatever that means)
> openblas-threads Pthreads version (why isn't that in the base package?)
> openblas and openblas-devel looks a bit simpler that openblas with
> libopenblas-devel and libopenblas_dynamic, IMHO.
openblas (source only)
No need to maintain the "_dynamic", it just coming from
past builds where I had specific build per core
More information about the Cygwin-apps