[ITP] openblas

[Marco Atzeri]

On 12/7/2014 11:03 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Dec  7 10:52, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> Hi Marco,
>>
>> On Dec  6 22:55, Marco Atzeri wrote:
>>> OpenBLAS is an optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2 1.13 BSD version.
>>> OpenBLAS is licensed under the 3-clause BSD license.
>>> http://www.openblas.net/
>>
>> Having said that, shouldn't the dynamic library be in the openblas
>> package, or, alternatively, shouldn't the (empty) OpenBLAS package
>> require libopenblas_dynamic?
>>
>> I just had a look into the Fedora package where the openblas package
>> contains the shared library and the basic documentation:
>>
>>    $ rpm -ql openblas
>>    /usr/lib64/libopenblas-r0.2.12.so
>>    /usr/lib64/libopenblas.so.0
>>    /usr/share/doc/openblas
>>    /usr/share/doc/openblas/Changelog.txt
>>    /usr/share/doc/openblas/GotoBLAS_00License.txt
>>    [...]
>>
>> Nevertheless, it's your call, so you can upload any time.
>
> Btw., where did you get the packaging layout from?  On Fedora it
> looks like this:
>
>    openblas           Shared lib
>    openblas-devel     Headers and libs
>    openblas-static    Static lib
>    openblas-openmp    OpenMP version   (whatever that means)
>    openblas-threads   Pthreads version (why isn't that in the base package?)
>
> openblas and openblas-devel looks a bit simpler that openblas with
> libopenblas-devel and libopenblas_dynamic, IMHO.

Debian
https://packages.debian.org/source/sid/openblas

openblas (source only)
libopenblas-base
libopenblas-devel

No need to maintain the "_dynamic", it just coming from
past builds where I had specific build per core

>
> Corinna
>