[RFC] cygport: arch-specific workdir
Ken Brown
kbrown@cornell.edu
Thu Mar 27 21:02:00 GMT 2014
On 3/27/2014 4:01 PM, Achim Gratz wrote:
> Yaakov (Cygwin/X) writes:
>>> Actually, that is experimental code (based on a request from another
>>> cygport user) that was accidentally shipped when I had to reroll the
>>> source tarball for compatibility with F20/UnversionedDocDirs. Would
>>> people like to see this done always, never, or only when cross-building?
>>
>> There hasn't been much comment on this. Since it would be a visible
>> change for package maintainers, I would appreciate more of a
>> consensus. Are there any objections to making the workdir always
>> arch-specific (IOW name-ver-rel.arch)?
>
> I would rather have {build,inst,dist}/<arch> directories inside the
> workdir so the same package could build for both x86 and x86_64 in one
> workdir.
That would be inconvenient for the situation where you have to do a new
build (and bump the release number) for only one arch. Also, there
might be arch-specific patches, requiring arch-specific src and origsrc
directories, so you don't really save any disk space by having a common
workdir.
Ken
More information about the Cygwin-apps
mailing list