[RFC] incremental rebase

[Achim Gratz]

Corinna Vinschen writes:
> I have to increment my idiot score by one.  This explanation only makes
> sense on NTFS, of course.  FAT doesn't sort at all.  And even on NTFS,
> the sort order is not just using the UTF-16 value of a character, but
> the UTF-16 value of the uppercased character(*).  Oh my.
>
> (*) http://blogs.msdn.com/b/oldnewthing/archive/2005/06/17/430194.aspx

So, since FAT(32) is still a viable option for an install location we
should sort the list of files we get from the find, right?

>> Good, I was just worried that someone with a strange locale might end up
>> with a different sort order.
>
> Let's just stick to ASCII for this.

Do we need to enforce that and if so, how?


Regards,
Achim.
-- 
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+

Waldorf MIDI Implementation & additional documentation:
http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfDocs