[RFC] incremental rebase

Achim Gratz Stromeko@nexgo.de
Thu Nov 27 17:51:00 GMT 2014

Corinna Vinschen writes:
> I have to increment my idiot score by one.  This explanation only makes
> sense on NTFS, of course.  FAT doesn't sort at all.  And even on NTFS,
> the sort order is not just using the UTF-16 value of a character, but
> the UTF-16 value of the uppercased character(*).  Oh my.
> (*) http://blogs.msdn.com/b/oldnewthing/archive/2005/06/17/430194.aspx

So, since FAT(32) is still a viable option for an install location we
should sort the list of files we get from the find, right?

>> Good, I was just worried that someone with a strange locale might end up
>> with a different sort order.
> Let's just stick to ASCII for this.

Do we need to enforce that and if so, how?

+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+

Waldorf MIDI Implementation & additional documentation:

More information about the Cygwin-apps mailing list