ffcall

[Ken Brown]

On 2/19/2015 2:46 PM, Reini Urban wrote:
> And the deal with the latest clisp 2.49 was that modules can be dynaloaded.
> If the gnulib steps would work. I never did for me. And I fixed most of
> the other
> module compilation problems before.

But I just discovered that clisp-2.49 builds fine with the configure option 
--without-dynamic-modules.  Is there any reason not to do that?  After all, 
clisp-2.48 is built without dynamic modules, so what's the harm in doing the 
same for 2.49?

Ken