Separate packages for completion scripts?
Andrew Schulman
schulman.andrew@epa.gov
Thu Feb 25 14:38:00 GMT 2016
> Seeking opinions from other package maintainers: is it desirable to have
> Bash (et al.) completion scripts as part of the main package they're
> associated with, or should they be packaged separately?
It seems simpler and completely reasonable to me to include the completion
scripts as part of the main package.
I agree that it must be rare for someone to want bash-completion and some
other package, but not the bash completion for that package. Many more
people will be inconvenienced by having to install a separate
foo-completion package.
Andrew
More information about the Cygwin-apps
mailing list