[ITP] FUSE 2.8
Sat Jul 23 17:48:00 GMT 2016
On Jul 23 16:43, Bill Zissimopoulos wrote:
> On 7/23/16, 3:40 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >no idea what's up between you, but this discussion is gross...
> >My interest in both of your projects has just dwindled considerably.
> Corinna, understood. I think this may have been the point.
So you quoted my knee-jerk reaction but missed to quote the *real* point
of my mail. Fixed that for you:
> > Here's an idea: You both slap yourself and start talking to each other.
> > For the Windows *and* Cygwin world it would be *much* preferrable if you
> > work together and create a single, unified FUSE concept, rather than
> > having two projects doing almost, but not entirely, the same thing,
> > Worse, given that FUSE only makes sense if user-space filesystems exist,
> > we now have two FUSE concepts with a disjunct set of user-space drivers.
> I was planning to work for a solution for how to have multiple *-fuse
> packages coexist based on Marco’s great answer.
Which is not the answer I'd expected since it completely ignores the
part about "talking to each other", "single FUSE concept" and
> If you do not believe
> there is any interest any more please let me know.
I was talking about *my* interest. Naturally I'm not speaking for the
entire group of maintainers.
I wouldn't block a package if there's no good reason like licensing
problems or a package completly ignoring collision with other, existing
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Cygwin-apps