[ITP] FUSE 2.8

[Herbert Stocker]

Hi all,

On 7/26/2016 8:27 AM, Mark Geisert wrote:
> You could define a package "fuse" with no contents and a dependency on
> package "winfsp-fuse".  Then later when/if another FUSE implementation
> becomes available, "somebody" could replace the "fuse" package with
> whatever is required to get alternatives support for the variants.

Does setup.exe already have a provision in the GUI to ask the user
which one they want to chose if two or more packages are able to
provide the (empty) fuse package?

> I'm wondering if "fuse-xxxx" is a better name template than "xxxx-fuse" in
> order to keep the variants near each other in setup.exe's displays.

good point.


Herbert Stocker