[ITP] FUSE 2.8
Tue Jul 26 18:41:00 GMT 2016
On 7/26/16, 11:13 AM, Mark Geisert wrote:
>Erm, I'm belatedly comprehending it's two independent FUSE
>implementations and not two versions with some common history. OK. If
>there's a documented binary API at some level of the FUSE definition
>that both implementations provide then that's what the proposed "fuse"
>package could export. Both implementations would then independently
>supply code that meets the API. I'm not sure how much extra work this
>means for both projects.
Mark, please see my other response, where I (think that I) proposed
More information about the Cygwin-apps