[ITP] FUSE 2.8

Bill Zissimopoulos billziss@navimatics.com
Tue Jul 26 18:41:00 GMT 2016

On 7/26/16, 11:13 AM, Mark Geisert wrote:

>Erm, I'm belatedly comprehending it's two independent FUSE
>implementations and not two versions with some common history.  OK.  If
>there's a documented binary API at some level of the FUSE definition
>that both implementations provide then that's what the proposed "fuse"
>package could export.  Both implementations would then independently
>supply code that meets the API.  I'm not sure how much extra work this
>means for both projects.

Mark, please see my other response, where I (think that I) proposed
something similar.


More information about the Cygwin-apps mailing list