[ACTION REQUIRED] ARCH=noarch uploads with cygport 0.22.0

[Ken Brown]

On 5/11/2016 6:17 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> On 2016-05-11 16:55, Ken Brown wrote:
>> On 5/11/2016 4:35 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
>>> I haven't moved these yet, but what about the rest of the collections?
>>> IIRC the
>>> TEXLIVE_ARCH_PKGS do have CPU-cygwin paths in the "sources", but are
>>> they
>>> *really* archful?
>>
>> No, the only issue is the sources.  As it stands, if someone downloads
>> the source from one arch and tries to build on the other, cygport will
>> complain about missing source packages.  Of course, running 'cygport
>> fetch' will fix that, so it's not a big deal.
>>
>> Maybe in the future we should add the TEXLIVE_ARCH_PKGS for both CPUs to
>> the sources, and then there's no issue at all.
>
> How about the attached?

Looks good to me.  Thanks.

Ken