[ACTION REQUIRED] ARCH=noarch uploads with cygport 0.22.0
Yaakov Selkowitz
yselkowitz@cygwin.com
Thu May 12 01:59:00 GMT 2016
On 2016-05-11 17:30, Ken Brown wrote:
> On 5/11/2016 6:17 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
>> On 2016-05-11 16:55, Ken Brown wrote:
>>> On 5/11/2016 4:35 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
>>>> I haven't moved these yet, but what about the rest of the collections?
>>>> IIRC the
>>>> TEXLIVE_ARCH_PKGS do have CPU-cygwin paths in the "sources", but are
>>>> they
>>>> *really* archful?
>>>
>>> No, the only issue is the sources. As it stands, if someone downloads
>>> the source from one arch and tries to build on the other, cygport will
>>> complain about missing source packages. Of course, running 'cygport
>>> fetch' will fix that, so it's not a big deal.
>>>
>>> Maybe in the future we should add the TEXLIVE_ARCH_PKGS for both CPUs to
>>> the sources, and then there's no issue at all.
>>
>> How about the attached?
>
> Looks good to me. Thanks.
Pushed.
--
Yaakov
More information about the Cygwin-apps
mailing list