[ACTION REQUIRED] ARCH=noarch uploads with cygport 0.22.0

[David Stacey]

On 11/05/16 21:15, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> On 2016-05-11 11:26, David Stacey wrote:
>> On 11/05/16 07:17, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
>>> On 2016-05-11 00:07, Marco Atzeri wrote:
>>>> So at this stage not the documentation subpackages, but only if all
>>>> subpackages are in this category. correct ?
>>>
>>> At this time we are only considering those where all subpackages are
>>> noarch, i.e. ARCH=noarch is (or will be) defined.
>>
>> Is it worth making libpoco-doc a separate package? It might be cleaner
>> that way, as the documentation and source code are in different tarballs
>> upstream.
>
> Your call, it doesn't appear that anything is gained from building it 
> together with poco itself.  I'd name the sources poco-doc and either:
>
> OBSOLETES=libpoco-doc
>
> or:
>
> PKG_NAMES="libpoco-doc"
> libpoco_doc_CONTENTS="usr/share/doc/poco/html/"


Thank you for your advice. I think I'd like to split the documentation 
into a separate package, as it will make it easier to maintain. As I'm 
creating a new top-level package, I'll send an ITP separately.

Dave.