[ITP] python3-pillow

[Yaakov Selkowitz]

On Mon, 2020-07-06 at 09:57 +0100, Hamish McIntyre-Bhatty via Cygwin-
apps wrote:
> On 05/07/2020 23:21, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> > On Fri, 2020-06-26 at 01:49 +0100, Hamish McIntyre-Bhatty via Cygwin-
> > apps wrote:
> > > This email signals my intent to package python3-pillow
> > > (https://pypi.org/project/Pillow) for Cygwin. Pillow is a fork of the
> > > Python Imaging Library.
> > > 
> > > I wish to package this because I have found that PyCrust (built with
> > > wxPython) depends on Pillow and won't run without it installed. As
> > > before, my test packages can be found at
> > > https://www.hamishmb.com/files/cygwin-temp/.
> > > 
> > > If anyone has feedback I'd appreciate it very much.
> > 1) Source packages are generally named python-*.
> Yes, but the latest build of Pillow doesn't support Python 2 - I feel
> calling it python-pillow would be misleading.

No, this is the naming scheme we've been using for Python packages.

python-foo: sources
pythonXY-foo: binaries for each supported X.Y version of Python

> > 2) This should be an ITA for python-imaging instead, which has been
> > Pillow-based for a long time.
> 
> The Python imaging library was replaced by Pillow as far as I can tell,
> and seems to have been unmaintained since 2011. Could you give me a link
> to the library you're talking about please?

As I said, our python-imaging packages have been from Pillow for quite
some time.  Technically, at this point they should be named python-pil
or the like, but the package name long predates the PIL namespace being
mandatory (not to mention the Pillow fork in general), but I never
renamed the packages to avoid the complications involved therein.
 Either way, "pillow" isn't the right name IMO because users don't
"from Pillow import", they "from PIL import".

--
Yaakov