Sun Nov 15 17:11:28 GMT 2020
On 2020-10-13 13:03, Achim Gratz wrote:
> Erwin Waterlander writes:
>> I would like to adopt orphaned package po4a.
> When you update the cygport file, please include a REQUIRES for
> perl5_030 to ease the transition when Perl next upgrades in a binary
> incompatible way. Thank you for adopting the package!
I have used the generic perl_base as perl5_030 is a virtual package perl_base
provides using that new keyword, although both names seem to be in
What are the best approaches for non-perl and perl packages?
I could see perhaps the generic is better for non-perl packages, and the
specific for perl packages?
Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
This email may be disturbing to some readers as it contains
too much technical detail. Reader discretion is advised.
[Data in binary units and prefixes, physical quantities in SI.]
More information about the Cygwin-apps