[GOLDSTAR] Re: [ITP] autoconf2.7
Fri Dec 3 16:14:59 GMT 2021
On Dec 3 14:42, ASSI wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen writes:
> > Since Fedora did basically the same, as Ken pointed out, maybe we're
> > a bit meticulous if we create a new package for 2.7x?
> Well, if we don't, we're SOL if we hit an incompatibility that the Linux
> folks don't need to care about… that was why I originally suggested to
> wait it out a bit.
> > I don't know how the experience is in the various environments, but
> > nobody appears to care...
> If I look at the changes, many are for "fringe" platforms, so how far
> out in the fringes is Cygwin?
No idea. I cringe at the idea of calling Cygwin a fringe platform.
Now, if you call Cygwin a Gringe platform OTOH :)
Nah, in fact, given we already have the autoconf versioning in place,
it probably doesn't hurt to do it right.
Btw., goldstar request for Achim here!
More information about the Cygwin-apps