[ITA] ruby-tk 0.4.0

[Daisuke Fujimura]

> Is this error expected?

Sorry, I missed that.

This seems to be caused by rdoc-6.1.2 not working with ruby-3.x.

- https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2019/12/12/separation-of-positional-and-keyword-arguments-in-ruby-3-0/

Therefore, it is necessary to update rdoc first, but packaging
rdoc-6.5.0 also fails for the same reason, so it needs to be updated
by other means besides scallywag:

- Create a package using ruby-2.6.4.
- Create a package using rdoc-6.5.0 installed in a different location
with gem install.

Other issues have also been found.

- https://github.com/cygwin/scallywag/actions/runs/4850129175/jobs/8642826755#step:6:223

This seems to need a fix in rubygems.cygclass, so I will send a patch.

I will work in the following order.

1. Send a patch for rubygems.cygclass
2. ITA ruby-rdoc
3. ITA ruby-tk


On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 2:56 AM Jon Turney <jon.turney@dronecode.org.uk> wrote:
>
> On 01/05/2023 10:54, Daisuke Fujimura via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > ====
> >
> > Cygportfile:
> > - https://cygwin.com/cgit/cygwin-packages/playground/tree/?h=ruby-tk
> >
> > Packages, logs:
> > - https://github.com/cygwin/scallywag/actions/runs/4850129175
>
> Is this error expected?
>
> https://github.com/cygwin/scallywag/actions/runs/4850129175/jobs/8642826755#step:6:1723
>
> >> If you subsequently adopt the ruby-tk package, please remember to add
> >> ruby_tk_OBSOLETES="ruby-tcltk" there (as that's the preferred way to
> >> record obsoletions nowadays)
> >
> > Added according to advice.
>
> Looks good.  I added this to your packages.
>
> Thanks