Reason for cover functions in

Paul K. Fisher
Mon May 8 18:08:00 GMT 2000

> From: Chris Faylor, Monday, May 08, 2000 10:51 AM
> On Sun, May 07, 2000 at 10:43:31PM -0500, Paul K. Fisher wrote:
> >Is there a reason to keep the cover functions in
> I don't know of any reason for this practice.  It has
> always mystified me.  Do things __pthread_attr_init
> exist in the spec?
No, not that I can see.  These are simply gratuitous.  I'll remove them in
my next patch.


More information about the Cygwin-developers mailing list