path bug in cygcheck?

Chris Faylor
Thu Sep 14 10:53:00 GMT 2000

On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 05:37:07PM +0100, David Starks-Browning wrote:
>On Thursday 14 Sep 00, DJ Delorie writes:
>> > I would say this is a defect, albeit a minor one, and perhaps not
>> > worth fixing.
>> In cygcheck, *all* bugs are worth fixing.  This is one of the few
>> programs that absolutely *must* do the right thing, because we use it
>> to diagnose user problems.
>In that case, I think that will require two separate path
>lists, one for searching programs and one for searching dll's.  The
>current problem stems from using the same data structure to serve both
>I would volunteer to have a go at this, but it would be some weeks
>before I could get started.

Since cygcheck has been like this for some time, I think we can afford
to wait.

If someone else wants to step in, though, please notify us here.


More information about the Cygwin-developers mailing list