[PATCH] change to thread.cc -- need feedback

Christopher Faylor cgf@redhat.com
Mon Sep 30 14:02:00 GMT 2002


On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 06:50:06AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
>On Tue, 2002-10-01 at 01:12, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> I've changed the static declarations in thread.cc to use
>> NO_COPY and things seem to be working better in my build.
>
>I've got some confusion going on I think.
>
>Whats the call order during fork of dll_crt0_1, and
>MTinterface::fixup_after_fork ()? 

dll_crt0_1 calls fork.

It seemed like it was possible that the static mutex value would be
overwritten when fork is called.  That's not handled in
MTinterface::fixup_after_fork, is it?

cgf



More information about the Cygwin-developers mailing list