Another (I assume) /proc SMP anomaly - cpu time is 2X greater than it should be

Elfyn McBratney
Sun Jul 13 14:53:00 GMT 2003

On Sun, 13 Jul 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:

> On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 03:32:54PM +0100, Elfyn McBratney wrote:
> >On Sun, 13 Jul 2003, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 09:22:17PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >> > I don't know for sure but, unless people are seeing this on a single
> >> > processor system, this is probably due to the fact that I'm running on
> >> > an SMP version of WinXP.
> >> >
> >> > Can somebody with a uniprocessor system confirm or deny this theory?
> >>
> >> Confirm.
> >
> >Deny. Working fine with snap-20030710. What's weird is that I didn't see the
> >earlier problem on an (SMP) WinXP VM...or 2000 for that matter.
> Deny meaning what?  What's snap-20030710?  Are you using a snapshot?  Why aren't
> you using CVS?
> Are you saying that the times are correctly reported?

Sorry, I wasn't too clear. It works fine for me on both SMP (VM) and
uniprocessor (again VM) on XP Home/2000.

I haven't re-built from CVS since the 10th (July) and am running with the latest
snapshot (from the 11th). I'll re-build now and try again, though.

I can send cygcheck and procps output, but my mount tables alone will flood the
list. :-)


Elfyn McBratney, EMCB  |  |       |  wwwauth-users AT nongnu DOT org

More information about the Cygwin-developers mailing list