[PATCH] performance patch for /proc/registry

[Corinna Vinschen]

On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 08:43:37AM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 04:08:45PM -0500, Joe Buehler wrote:
> > > $ ls -l /proc/registry
> > > total 0
> > > dr-xr--r--  1632 Administ ????????        0 Jul 25  1996 HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT
> > > dr-xr--r--    2 Administ ????????        0 Oct 10  1996 HKEY_CURRENT_CONFIG
> > > dr-x------    8 Administ ????????        0 Dec  5  2001 HKEY_CURRENT_USER
> > > dr-xr-xr-x    1 0        0               0 Mar 25 15:53 HKEY_DYN_DATA
> > > dr-xr-xr--    5 Administ system          0 Mar 24 10:31 HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE
> > > dr-xr-xr-x    0 0        0               0 Dec 31  1969 HKEY_PERFOMANCE_DATA
> > > dr-xr-xr--    3 Administ system          0 Mar 24 10:31 HKEY_USERS
> > > $
> > >
> > > Are those permissions correct?  They are same as /proc/registry without
> >
> > Dunno.  In RegEdit I can see the DACL, but no ownership.  We have to
> > trust the values returned by the appropriate system functions I guess ;-)
> >
> > Corinna
> 
> RegEdt32, Security->Permissions->Advanced->Owner (on Win2k).
> 	Igor

There's no RegEdt32 on XP.  Regedit has taken over the job entirely.
However, I found the owner info in Regedit.  It was in the obvious spot.
>From what I can tell, the above looks ok... except for the ????????.

Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer                                mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com
Red Hat, Inc.