ntsec a mount option?

Christopher Faylor cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please@cygwin.com
Tue Jul 15 17:08:00 GMT 2008


On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 05:30:45PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Jul 15 09:44, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 10:47:05AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> >What about the mount -m option?  That doesn't seem to make much sense
>> >anymore, given that you just can copy the fstab files now.
>> 
>> I guess we could get rid of that too but it might almost make sense to
>> make it dump fstab entries.  Then you'd catch any mounts you've made
>> recently that aren't in the fstab.
>
>Sounds like a plan.
>
>> >Hmm, along the same lines, practically all umount options don't make
>> >much sense anymore.
>> >
>> >> (along with text-mode mounts?)
>> >
>> >Repurpose textmode mounts?  I'm not sure I understand...
>> 
>> "Repurpose" == "obliterate"
>
>Uh, oh.  You know, *personally* I'm all for it, but I fear the uproar
>on the Cygwin list.

Nah, I bet no one would even notice.

cgf

(Who's hoping to be immortalized along the lines of "Why would anyone ever
need more than 640K")



More information about the Cygwin-developers mailing list