Mon Sep 10 11:17:00 GMT 2001
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >I'm not wild about using something called NONAMELESSUNION to control
> >whether a nameless *structure* is defined but I guess it's ok.
Never the less, the MSDN will have the control on how this is
implemented if it applies in this case. Or is NONAMELESSUNION something
we've made up along the way?
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
More information about the Cygwin-patches